feat(platform): flag repo runs whose PR data is incomplete - #282

The engine now reports pr_enrichment_degraded when its PR read fell back to
partial data, and the repo page showed such a run like a complete one. The
two panels the issue asks to mark are exactly the ones a degraded run does
not render: the flow card needs the flow metrics that degradation removes,
and the merge badge hides when the strategy is unknown.

An amber badge in the page header names the failed steps in its tooltip.
prDegradedSteps reads the field defensively, since ingestion stores any
payload shape; a Record keyed by PrReadStep makes the compiler require
every step in both directions. es-ES falls back to en-US, as it already
does for the merge-strategy badge.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

The tooltip said merge strategy is shown as unknown whatever step failed,
while with only the reviews or basic step failed the page shows the real
merge badge beside it. It now says the strategy is not classified when
enrichment fails, calls the affected metrics missing or skewed rather than
understated, and drops the promise that the next run recovers them. The
PrReadStep type moves above the ReportMetrics doc comment, which it had
detached from the interface.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

When the PR reviews read degrades, the engine omits single_pass_rate and
median_review_rounds from each acceptance_by_origin / acceptance_by_tool
group. The org PR health and tool comparison aggregations multiplied those
fields by a weight, so a missing value would have become NaN and poisoned
the whole org-level number. Both fields are now optional and a group is
only summed when the values are numbers, so the result equals that of a
run without the group.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…hboard

The badge on the repo page was the only place a degraded PR read showed;
the compare table and the org dashboard rendered such a run like a
complete one. The compare table now shows an amber marker (with the same
tooltip text, also as screen-reader text) per repo, read through
prDegradedSteps from the repo_metric_summaries payload. The select falls
back to the pre-023 column list when the view has no payload, so the
table stays populated, just unmarked. The dashboard shows an amber note
above the PR-driven panels listing the affected repos, computed from the
payloads it already loads. es-ES falls back to en-US.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

The amber dot on the compare table only had a `title` on a non-focusable
span, so keyboard and touch users could not learn what it meant. When at
least one visible row is marked, a one-line legend under the table now
shows the dot and the existing "PR data incomplete" text. The per-row
`title` is dropped since the sr-only text already carries the detail.

The pt-BR dashboard note said "no run mais recente"; every other pt-BR
string says "execução".

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Degraded steps showed as raw ids ("enrichment") in the repo badge and
the compare marker. They now go through a localized label
(repos.detail.prData.steps.*, en-US and pt-BR; es-ES falls back) via
formatPrSteps.

prDegradedSteps drops repeated steps, so a payload listing one twice no
longer prints it twice.

The dashboard note listed every degraded repo; it now names at most 5
and collapses the rest into "and N more" / "e mais N".

anyPrDataIncomplete was a one-line wrapper; the compare view checks
inline instead. The repo page comment claimed the flow and merge panels
are absent exactly when the read degraded, which is false when only
"basic" failed.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

The amber marker and its legend only existed in the desktop table, so
the md:hidden card stack gave no sign a repo's PR read degraded. The
marker is now one component used by both layouts, and the legend sits
below both so either one explains it.

The dot gains a title (hover for sighted users) next to its sr-only
text; the legend keeps the meaning off colour and off the tooltip.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

The amber dot is the only per-row cue on the compare page, and
amber-500 sits near 2.1:1 on the light card, below the 3:1 WCAG 1.4.11
asks of it. The dot and its legend now use amber-600 on light (about
3.2:1) and keep amber-500 on dark (well above 3:1).

The PR-data tooltip said merge strategy isn't classified "when
enrichment fails"; the engine only skips it when enrichment fails for
merged PRs, so the copy now says so, in both locales.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

The failed PR-read steps lived only in a hover title and screen-reader
text, on the compare dot and on the repo-page badge, so touch and
keyboard users could see that the read was incomplete but not where.
The mobile compare card now shows the localized steps as muted text
next to the dot, and the repo page shows them next to the badge.

On the card the visible steps replace the dot's sr-only sentence, so
screen readers read them once, after a short sr-only "PR data
incomplete:" prefix. The card marker also drops its ml-2: the row
already spaces its items with gap-2. The desktop table is unchanged.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

The reason for the `as unknown as` cast in getOrgReposSummary sat two
lines above the query, away from the cast it explains. The query
result is now bound first and the cast returned on its own line, with
the reason right above it. No behavior change.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Renders the compare view with one degraded and one clean repo and
checks what the last fixes changed: the mobile card shows the failed
steps as text after an sr-only prefix, the full sentence stays
screen-reader text only in the table, the card marker has no margin,
and the dot is amber-600 with amber-500 only on dark. All four fail
against the previous marker.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

A failed open list, or a failed enrichment or reviews pass for open
PRs, leaves open-PR fields out of the run, and the engine's report
caveat now says so. The tooltip on the PR-data badge and marker listed
only flow, review and in-PR metrics; it now names open-PR metrics too,
in both locales.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

A failed merged list omits the PR lifecycle fields (counts, time to
merge, cycle time), and a partial read skews them. The engine's report
caveat now says so; the PR-data tooltip mirrors it in both locales.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

The repo-page badge now has the failed steps as visible text beside
it, yet kept a title with the same steps in a sentence. Screen readers
may read a title as a description, so the steps could be announced
twice. The title goes; the visible text carries the steps.

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

The desktop compare table kept the failed PR-read steps in a hover
title and screen-reader text only, so sighted keyboard users could not
see them, and on the mobile card the steps sat inline with the
truncating repo name, where a long list squeezed it.

Both layouts now put the amber dot and the localized steps on a line
of their own under the repo name. The dot and the steps are
aria-hidden, carrying the full sentence as their hover title, and
screen readers read that sentence once as sr-only text, in both
layouts alike (the card's short sr-only prefix gives way to it).

Refs #236

Assisted-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

fix(platform): make the PR-data query opt-in and localize its steps

feat(platform): mark incomplete PR data on compare and dashboard